Field Reports

Subscribe

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Allyson and Bekah Arrive at the ISRU Field Site

by Bekah Shepard

Ahhhh, Hawaii. The Big Island. Palm trees, tropical ocean, coconuts, yummy coffee – you can’t beat a tropical field destination! Of course, when Allyson and I arrived at the site, this is what we saw…

Base-camp

ISRU Base Camp

Where are all the beaches and palm trees! Can you guess where we are on the Big Island? I’ll give you a few hints. It is quite chilly. We are quite close to the stars. How about this one: we are on the tallest mountain in the world if you measure from the seafloor! If you guessed Mauna Kea, you are correct!

The ISRU field site sits in a crater at about 9000 feet above sea level on the slopes of the extinct volcano Mauna Kea. The site was chosen because of the cold, dusty conditions and the presence of volcanics that are similar in many ways to what exists on the Moon. Working at a high elevation and on the slopes of a mountain can be pretty tough – plenty of wind, occasional dust storms, lots of fog, and the threat of altitude sickness or overexertion. In truth, however, it is also a beautiful place to work. Mauna Kea offers lovely views, interesting volcanic rocks, and the thrill of spending time on such a large and powerful mountain. In fact, Mauna Kea is considered a very spiritually powerful place to the native Hawaiians – you can check out a brief introduction to that history here: http://www.imiloahawaii.org/59/maunakea.

Hawaii... a fine place to do research in February! (Photo: Bekah Shepard)

Hawaii... a fine place to do research in February! (Photo: Bekah Shepard)

Base camp is a small tent city. We have a mess tent (yum – lunch!), a medical tent, an administration tent, tents for the scientists, tents for the engineers, and tents that function as garages for the instruments and robotics that are being tested. Allyson and I settled into one of the science tents, but didn’t stay inside too long! Right away, we set about following the various science and engineering teams in their testing activities. Details about what we found to come!

- Bekah


Sunday, January 31st, 2010

PLRP Meets ISRU

by Bekah Shepard

Aloha! That’s right – PLRP is visiting Hawaii! To be more specific, Allyson and myself have journeyed to the Big Island to take part in another exploration analogue test – the In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Test. ISRU is just a fancy way of saying “using the resources that are in place”, but in this case, we mean resources that are “in place” on the Moon or Mars. Some of the major goals of planetary exploration are sample return (bringing samples from other planets to Earth) and human exploration. Both of these ventures will require lots of fuel, and in the case of human exploration, plenty of oxygen and water. To send enough of these resources to the Moon or another planet would be incredibly expensive, and might even take several trips! Therefore, learning to use resources “in place” to generate fuel, oxygen, and water will be a great help to planetary exploration!

“But what are you Pavilion Lake researchers doing at an ISRU field test?” I hear you cry. It is true that our main focus at Pavilion Lake is the scientific exploration of the lake and its microbialites. However, as our project has grown and the exploration has become more complicated (submersibles, AUV’s, complicated communications, LOTS of people working to support the science) we realized that it can sometimes be challenging to keep the science as the top priority! In our struggles to do science as effectively and successfully as we can, we realized that developing metrics (tools for evaluating how successful we are at doing research) was surprisingly helpful!

ISRU-tent

Our tent at ISRU-Hawaii. Yes, this really is Hawaii.

We have since gone on to collaborate with folks developing the next generation Lunar Rover, and have applied our metrics to their Desert RATs analogue test site in Arizona. (Check out the NASA analogue site for more information about RATs: http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/analogs/). That collaboration has continued, and when the opportunity arose to test our metrics in yet another analogue setting, we jumped at the chance! Why? The balance between science, engineering, and operations in different in each of these analogue field tests, and that difference helps us to hone our metrics. We are gaining a better and better understanding of how science functions in each of these types of analogues, and that helps us all to become better exploration scientists.

Stay tuned for next time when Allyson and Bekah say “Hey! This is Hawaii! Where are all the beaches and palm trees!?!

- Bekah


Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

What Did You Do On Your Summer Vacation?

by Bree and Jen

This is a question that we ask our students on the first day of school in September. Boy, we have some interesting things to share on our first day of school. This summer, we travelled together to the Pavilion Lake Research Project to learn about the science that is being done here and how it can be incorporated into the classroom. During the year Bree and I are both immersed in the classroom, and most of the time we are teaching science. Today we have found ourselves writing a blog which neither of us have done before. We seem to be entertaining the people around us with our different ideas of how best to compose one of these, and we will find out if we get a gold star later. The crew here have been very welcoming and happy to share about what they do here. In fact, our first night here we were allowed to get inside one of the DeepWorker submersibles which are used during the scientist flight missions (we were still on dry land, but still very cool). Part of us being here at Pavilion Lake was to integrate teachers into the different activities that go on here, and integrate us they did.

From left, Bree Riddell, Ricky Arnold and Jen Stonehouse

From left, Bree Riddell, Ricky Arnold and Jen Stonehouse

So we are sure you are wondering what we were were able to do at the lake. Unfortunately we were not allowed to drive the subs but we had many other cool opportunities to be part of the team. We sat in on science meetings, pilot meetings, classified data from the submersibles, talked to scientists and astronauts, observed the launches of the submersibles and helped record data from the flights as a science stenographer. One of things that we did was classify the images returned from the underwater flights. During the flights images of what the pilots see is recorded on camera. The pilots see very cool things when on their mission – microbialites. After the mission this data then has to be classified. We looked at images to identified what was in the image – microbialites, algae, rocks, sediment, trash – oh my! This is something that can easily be transferred to the classroom. We classify every day just like the scientists (just on a different level). As the team here classifies these images for science and further understanding, students can also classify these images in the process of learning how to do science. Trust us (or read the rest of these blogs if you don’t), microbialites are very interesting!

How did we do with our first blog? Did we get a gold star?

-Jen and Bree


Monday, July 13th, 2009

Thank you, Pavilion Lake Community!

by Ben Cowie
Community Day was a great success this year - with nearly 100 visitors from Pavilion Lake, the surrounding communities, and as far away as Kamloops

Community Day was a great success this year - with nearly 100 visitors from Pavilion Lake, the surrounding communities, and as far away as Kamloops

On Saturday evening, the PLRP opened its doors to the Pavilion Lake community! Roughly 100 people visited our community open house to learn about our project and how we study the lake they call home. We especially enjoyed the enthusiastic questions, the smiles and good wishes from everyone who attended the event.

Community members were invited into the Mobile Mission Command Center to check out our communications and lab equipment.

Community members were invited into the Mobile Mission Command Center to check out our communications and lab equipment.

We are very grateful for the support of the community at Pavilion Lake and the Ts’kw’aylaxw First Nation. Thank you all, from PLRP.

-Ben


Friday, July 10th, 2009

Why do the microbialites have different shapes?

by Dawn Sumner
Different microbialites have different shapes.  Why?  How do we even answer this question?  One approach is to look at the building blocks of microbialites – the legos that stack together to make the structures.  Some microbialites have little tufts on them that make the surface rough.  These tufts are composed of the mineral calcite, which is intermixed with long, hair-like bacteria that come in two colors, pink and green.  The calcite makes the microbialite a rock, and the bacteria shape the tufts.  They are all lined up, pointing upward into the water like spiked hair.
These tufts are one of the building blocks for the microbialites.  How many there are, how they are arranged, and how fast they grow help shape the microbialites.  Lots of closely spaced tufts growing quickly create rough surfaces on the microbialites.  If the tufts grow slowly and there is lots of calcite, they only form small bumps.  If they are absent, the microbialites are smooth.  These smooth microbialites might need a different building block to form, one we haven’t identified yet.
The bacteria that form the tufts are photosynthetic – they use light to grow.  The tops of microbialites get more light than the sides do.  We can measure this, and it’s true in Pavilion Lake.  If tufts grow faster with more light and there is more light at the tops of the microbialites, we can predict that the tops might grow more quickly than the sides.  We haven’t measured this because the microbialites grow very slowly, and growth rates are very hard to measure.  However, the shapes of the microbialites suggest that they mostly grow upward.  Many of them have ridges on their sides pointing up or “chimneys” on top.  Thus, our prediction is consistent with the data we have so far.
Do we now understand why different microbialites have different shapes?  Nope!  The tuft building blocks that we’ve been analyzing should all behave about the same on near-by microbialites.  But the near-by microbialites aren’t all the same shape!  Maybe some of the differences are due to differences in growth rate, but I think there are probably more building blocks that we haven’t described yet.  To make a lego boat, you need different blocks than you do to make a lego submersible.  To make a dome-shaped microbialite, you might need different blocks than you do to make an “artichoke-shaped” microbialite.  We still have a lot to learn.

Different microbialites have different shapes.  Why?  How do we even answer this question? One approach is to look at the building blocks of microbialites – the legos that stack together to make the structures.  Some microbialites have little tufts on them that make the surface rough.  These tufts are composed of the mineral calcite, which is intermixed with long, hair-like bacteria that come in two colors, pink and green.  The calcite makes the microbialite a rock, and the bacteria shape the tufts.  They are all lined up, pointing upward into the water like spiked hair.

Close-up depiction of smooth and rough microbialite surfaces

Close-up depiction of smooth and rough microbialite surfaces

These tufts are one of the building blocks for the microbialites.  How many there are, how they are arranged, and how fast they grow help shape the microbialites.  Lots of closely spaced tufts growing quickly create rough surfaces on the microbialites.  If the tufts grow slowly and there is lots of calcite, they only form small bumps.  If they are absent, the microbialites are smooth.  These smooth microbialites might need a different building block to form, one we haven’t identified yet.

Smooth Microbialite Surface

Smooth Microbialite Surface

The bacteria that form the tufts are photosynthetic – they use light to grow.  The tops of microbialites get more light than the sides do.  We can measure this, and it’s true in Pavilion Lake.  If tufts grow faster with more light and there is more light at the tops of the microbialites, we can predict that the tops might grow more quickly than the sides.  We haven’t measured this because the microbialites grow very slowly, and growth rates are very hard to measure.  However, the shapes of the microbialites suggest that they mostly grow upward.  Many of them have ridges on their sides pointing up or “chimneys” on top.  Thus, our prediction is consistent with the data we have so far.

Closeup image of Microbialite

Closeup image of Microbialite

Do we now understand why different microbialites have different shapes?  Nope!  We still have a lot to learn, and many of the questions surrounding microbialite formation remain unanswered. The tuft building blocks that we’ve been analyzing should all behave about the same on near-by microbialites.  But the near-by microbialites aren’t all the same shape! Maybe some of the differences are due to differences in growth rate, but I think there are probably more building blocks that we haven’t described yet.  One thing to think about before I finish: To make a lego boat, you need different blocks than you do to make a lego submersible.  To make a dome-shaped microbialite, you might need different blocks than you do to make an “artichoke-shaped” microbialite.  This kind of thinking might help us solve one of the big mysteries of Pavilion Lake!

-Dawn


Friday, July 10th, 2009

Not your average field cuisine – high nutrition in the field

by Dana Lis

It takes more than just pasta and sauce to keep this crew running. Even though all the personnel at PLRP have high-energy days, as a dietitian I am most concerned with fueling the scuba divers and DeepWorker pilots. The caloric needs and metabolic demands of DeepWorker pilots have not been researched, but those of scuba divers have. The diving crew here is in the water for an average of 3-4 hours per day and it is imperative that they are well fed with a diet high in complex carbohydrates, moderate protein and adequate fluids. Keeping them fed well not only prevents an accumulated energy deficit, but ensures they are operating at their mental peak.The aerobic stresses of scuba diving can be quite physiologically demanding… especially when you are in cold water for up to 4 hrs a day for 2 weeks straight like the PLRP diving crew.

Dana showing off her pizza crust throwing skills. (Photo: Jeffrey Berman)

Dana showing off her pizza tossing skills. (Photo: Jeffrey Berman)

Some of these environmental stress here which increase the divers energy needs include:

  • Cold stresses from submersion in cold water
  • Themoclimes
  • Currents
  • Increased ambient pressure
  • Raised partial pressure of O2
  • Increased resistance to movement
  • Weight and drag of diving equipment (my bike weighs 14 lbs, diving equipment is way too heavy, if you ask me)
  • Higher breathing resistance

Research estimates energy expenditure to be about 300 kcal per 30 minute dive in 30-60 feet of water. Energy needs are higher for very recreational divers (like myself) who thrash around for 30 minutes just getting flippers on. For the PLRP diving crew this may add up to an additional 1200 calories per day expended from the time in the water!

As for feeding a crew of 40-60 people from a residential kitchen with one cook (me), no grocery store within a 50-kilometer radius… stay turned for details on organizing this kind of food service.

-Dana


Thursday, July 9th, 2009

A New Canadian Astronaut Visits Pavilion Lake

by Jeremy Hansen

This year at Pavilion Lake, I have been introduced to fascinating microbialite structures, seemingly created by simple life forms over thousands of years.  The rare occasion to witness these, during a scuba dive, with my own eyes was a privilege.  I have also been impressed by the quality, professionalism and motivation of the individuals dedicated to the Pavilion Lake Research Project as they search for knowledge that answers questions about the beginning of life on earth.  This challenging and fundamental science can lead to discoveries we haven’t even contemplated.

The Pavilion Lake Research Project is demonstrating the incredible advancement of science possible when great minds share a common goal and it is providing an elegant example of the combination of field science and challenging operations that will be required in our continued quest for knowledge on the Moon, Mars and beyond.

- Jeremy

Jeremy (right) with Dave Williams (left) on the deck overlooking Pavilion Lake

Jeremy (left) with Dave Williams (right) on the deck overlooking Pavilion Lake


Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Incredible Communications at Pavilion Lake

by Marc Seibert

[Bekah, talking to Marc at Desert RATS 2008] “Hey – let me ask you something…  Ok, so we have this lake up in Canada that is really long, really deep, is surrounded by steep walls and lots of trees, and has some really cool ‘microbialite’ structures in it!”

[Marc] ok? [thinking: Microbe-o-light? Sounds like a really small flashlight like thingy – maybe these things glow and give off light. ; ) does the lake bottom glow? Can it be seen from space? Can we communicate with it? I’m always looking for new technology to communicate – maybe these microbe-o-light’s are the next [OLEDs]!! Bummer: Turns out they’re not – they don’t emit photons at all. ]

[Bekah, continues (summarized)] “We’re studying the ‘morphology’ of the structures on the lake floor, and the way we study them is similar to how we’ll study things on Mars when we send people there…”

[Marc] How cool is that! [thinking: Good for you, sounds like cool science – but I’m not a microbialite scientist – how can our team help?]

[Bekah] We need communications. We want to link the underwater operations to people on the shore for the first time during the sub operations. We want them to interact, and understand the best ways to do things. [enthusiastically] Can we get video from the submarines back to the shore???

[Marc] maybe – can we drag a buoy behind the sub? [thinking: then you can have video!]

[Marc, thinking, reading into Bekah’s comments and from conversations in NASA Analog Mission meetings] Ok, it’s been stated and restated to me but I finally get it. Imagine we send humans back to the moon or to Mars, and every second that a person is on the planet costs lot of money – so we want to make it very valuable. We expect that on planetary missions. In this project, microbiolite science is the end product, and the team members are working on advance degrees, etc. HOWEVER, learning how to explore a planetary body while they are collecting their science products is also a key part of their research, AND a very cool approach. What surprises me most is the PLRP team could simply study these structures and go home – but instead they want to combine their exploration of this lake in a manner that will make planetary exploration much better when humans are involved. This makes their day much longer, requires much more coordination and planning, and makes end-to-end processes more strict. But they do it. Humans will advance. How cool is that? Wow.]

We got an enthusiastic go-ahead from NASA HQ to do this work together, and build on it. So here we are!

The Pavilion Lake Research Project (PLRP) team already had a significant amount of momentum before the comm team arrived. They have been studying this lake for years – but big things are ahead. My team is new here, and we’re working just to catch up. We’re learning how this team works, how they study their samples, how they interact with the sub flights, how they wash dishes, and how well they eat – thanks to Dana (she should be cooking for Olympic Athletes).

So, from a communications perspective, the Exploration-relevant topic we’re concerned about is: “how much communication between human explorers and Earth is necessary to “maximize” amount of things we learn about the planet?”

Ask yourself (or your students) this: When we send people back to the moon then to Mars, how often do you think Earth needs to talk to them to accomplish the mission? (Keep in mind that today we are in almost constant contact with our Crews orbiting Earth)

After all the missions we’ve had to the moon and to Earth’s orbit, this is the core question we’re asking ourselves, again. Every answer to this question has a different cost to the public and associated complexity (and risk) to the mission. For example, continuous communication to explorers is really nice to have, but has a significant cost and complexity to achieve – do we really need it? Is it required for safety? For science? How much bandwidth is needed for science data downlink to Earth? How fast does Earth need the science or navigation data to assist the explorers? We’re trying to answer these questions in analog missions.

For this PLRP mission, we’ve procured a big Internet data pipe along the lake, and we’re slinging it wirelessly across the lake using a high-power, “meshing” WiFi technology, to enable data to pass from the explorers out in the Nuytco subs back to the “control center” on shore. This is a big lake, and “illuminating” big chunks of the lake with “broadband” data is really challenging, so we’re moving our gear daily to maximize performance for the scientists, day by day.

We’re also working this year to allow teams in the command center to hear the comments live from the scientist-pilots. We believe this will help the science annotation process be more efficient. To improve upon this, next year we plan to allow the CAPCOM in the command center to talk to the sub pilots in real time, and if we get our wish, we hope to have live video from the subs in the command center as well!

-Marc


Monday, July 6th, 2009

Anticipation is Over: First Deepworker Operations of 2009

by Ben Cowie


The anticipation finally ended today as the first set of DeepWorker pilots began the exploration of Pavilion Lake for 2009! Margarita Marinova and Mike Gernhardt each flew tracks through the Central Basin and the incredible science backroom team had the data processed and available for our evening science tagup. This is the first time we’ve been able to achieve this type of turnaround, making video from the sub available to be projected onto a screen in a little under 2 hours. The discussion that followed from the video footage was excellent, raising several new and interesting scientific questions, and we are looking forward to seeing daily mission highlights throughout the field season. Check out Mike Gernhardt’s blog for a sample of what he and the PLRP team was able to observe from just one flight this afternoon!

While the DeepWorkers were busy in the water, the AUV team was busy generating a high-resolution bathymetry map of the lake bed, sending Gavia on a mission for data-collection, and preparing for tomorrow’s experiment that uses both DeepWorker and Gavia to investigate the groundwater springs found at the south end of the lake. The high resolution bathymetry map will be especially useful to determine slope aspects along the basin walls, which is difficult to measure directly using divers or other means.

In addition to the lake exploration today, Dawn Sumner and Bekah Shepard were busy growing their recently collected microbial mats in our on-site laboratory. We are anticipating some excellent time-lapse photography from this experiment later in the week, and these changes in mat structure may be able explain some of the diversity we observe in the microbialites at Pavilion Lake.

For more photos of our operation, check our Picasa site: http://picasaweb.google.com/pavilion.lake for daily photo updates, or any of the other media channels available through the “Follow Me” link on the right of this page!

Cheers,

Ben


Sunday, July 5th, 2009

Day 2: camp is buzzing, science ops begin

by Ben Cowie

There is so much going on today on the first day of science operations, it’s almost too much to follow all of it! The DeepWorker submersibles arrived from Vancouver, and the expert team from Nuytco ensured they were guided safely into the water. The team was on hand to see the subs launched into Pavilion Lake, enabling another season of successful science and exploration. Photos from the launch are available here: http://www.pavilionlake.com/deepworker-launch-2009.php

The NASA Mobile Mission Control Center was on site when I arrived, and the whole team was working hard to set up the lab facilities, enable the communications systems and WiFi network that covers the lake, and get camp set up for our field season.

UBC-Gavia also went for a late Saturday night test-flight, complete with a new navigation system provided by Art Trembanis. This navigation system enables very high resolution mapping of the bottom of the lakebed that will contribute to our understanding of the microbialite distribution in the lake.

Today we also welcomed Shad Valley-UBC campus, (www.shad.ca) remotely in via videoconference. The Shads (students at Shad Valley) will be following our mission and interacting with our team via Skype, analogous to how mission control would interact with an outpost on the moon. They will have the opportunity to ask our scientists about our findings at the lake, and in the process, learn about analog science and exploration research.

Things are moving at light-speed around the Lake, and lots of science is upcoming for tomorrow. The first DeepWorker flights will be piloted by Mike Gernhardt and Margarita Marinova (who both just arrived this afternoon), kicking off our season of underwater exploration.

Stay tuned, we’re just getting started here at Pavilion Lake!

-Ben